Whom to Blame: Is it my SEO applications or is it Search Engines?
I confess. Before learning about SEO software and site promotion field, I was of the opinion that Google was incredible. I Used Google to look for anything from celebrities, to visuals, to news stories to odd gadgets and naively trusted the search outcomes. Then I learned about SEO software and an emerging industry specializing in Web promotion, and my convictions were never the same. But even before that, having done a bit of reflective analysis, I got a hunch that search engines, Google to boot, know far from everything, and divulge to the web community a tiny portion of that.
My search escapades soon persuaded me that Flikr is a better image data bank, that with the help of Digg I can get interesting current events stories without having to rummage through Google search results (rummaging is more fitting than Google search), and human search is better administered by Facebook. It seems like whenever I look for weird things on Google, the results are often inaccurate, to put it mildly. Try searching for SEO tools and other SEO connected themes on Google and you are almost prepared to surrender your patience. I mean, come on, what’s the relationship between SEO apps and online education sites or Web casinos? It happens in my distress.
So when news of seo software review and the entire field built around it came into my humble worldview, my suspicions about webpages landing on P1 of Google increased exponentially. Do they merit to show up on there and who is to blame, Google or site promoters using SEO programs. The ethical quandary is vast. Do I seize using my SEO rank checker or do I seize using Google instead? I concluded that I can’t boycott Google just yet. At least not till the worthy rival enters the market. For now I will keep juggling between Blekko, Google and the above methods to complement the SERP mess that Google is. And, oh,yes, I will continue playing with my SEO applications.
Frankly, SEO products is the reason why folks like myself get some visibility online. smart as they are, search engine robots are unlikely to find some little guy and position his webpage well. In this regard, I remain a steadfast advocate of SEO software and non-paid search. If it was all about the paid search, the multinational businesses would squish me before I knew it. And there are hundreds of companies on the Fortune list! But here is something else that irritates me and other backlink check users, I am certain. There are people who purchase SEO software products and use them to sell beddingon casino sites and such. What we see is junk that not only exists on the web but is also highly positioned by search engines.
What is the public perspective on this? People search for SEO application reviews and will instead find irrelevant content. They get disappointed. So much for the “Internet justice”. Does this imply that SEO application and service industry is bad? I don’t think so.
The unethical users of SEO programs have to stop corrupting the Net but it’s like asking hackers to stop cracking the code. The bad thing about it is that black hat SEOs are abusing the prospect to be seen on the Web that is available to the little guy like me. For now users just have to be patient with them. We can only hope that Google will put more effort into finding the schemers unethically using SEO programs, and if Google doesn’t, the future Google will.
Tags: google, Optimization, SEO, software. tools, tool